Effect of Cable Stiffness and Waves Parameters on the Dynamic Responses of Submerged Floating Tunnel

Naik Muhammad, Azmatullah Khan, Zafar Baloch, Muhammad Habib, Saeedullah Jan Mandokhail


Submerged floating tunnel (SFT) is a new structural solution for waterway crossings compared to the classical solutions such as cable supported bridge, immersed tunnel or underground tunnel. An SFT is subjected to extreme waves, currents, earthquakes and other environmental loadings. The effect of key structural and waves parameters are important from the design perspective for an SFT. This study, the dynamic responses of SFT are evaluated using truss and catenary cables to check the effect of cable stiffness. The second part of this study deals with the effect of wave height and wave period on the dynamic responses of SFT. 3D truss and 3D catenary cables give very similar dynamic responses under waves and vertical ground motions. The wave height and wave period mainly control the dynamic behavior of SFT.


Submerged Floating Tunnel; Truss Cable; Catenary Cable; Effect of Waves Parameters

Full Text:



· Ahrens D. (1997). Submerged floating tunnels a concept whose time has arrived. Tunnelling and

Underground Space Technology 12(2): 317-336.

· Brancaleoni F, Castellani A, D'Asdia P. (1989). The response of submerged tunnels to their

environment. Engineering Structures 11(1): 47-56.

· Chakrabarti S K. (1987). Hydrodynamics of offshore structures: WIT press. Offshore Structure

Analysis Inc, USA.

· Di Pilato M, Feriani A, Perotti F. (2008). Numerical models for the dynamic response of submerged

floating tunnels under seismic loading. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37(9):


· Di Pilato M, Perotti F, Fogazzi P. (2008). 3D dynamic response of submerged floating tunnels

under seismic and hydrodynamic excitation. Engineering Structures 30(1): 268-281.

· Faggiano B, Landolfo R, Mazzolani F. (2005). The SFT: an innovative solution for waterway strait

crossings. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering. IABSE Symposium

Report 90(10):36-42.

· Fogazzi P, Perotti F. (2000). The dynamic response of seabed anchored floating tunnels under

seismic excitation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 29(3): 273-295.

· Li J, Li YS. (2006). Analytical solution to the vortex-excited vibration of tether in the submerged

floating tunnel. In Underground Construction and Ground Movement. Pp. 164-169.

· Long X, Ge F, Hong Y. (2015). Feasibility study on buoyancy–weight ratios of a submerged floating

tunnel prototype subjected to hydrodynamic loads. Acta Mechanica Sinica/Lixue Xuebao 31(5):


· Long X, Ge F, Wang L, Hong Y. (2009). Effects of fundamental structure parameters on dynamic

responses of submerged floating tunnel under hydrodynamic loads. Acta Mechanica Sinica 25(3):


· Luoa G, Chen J, Zhou X. (2015). Effects of various factors on the viv-induced fatigue damage in

the cable Of submerged floating tunnel. Polish Maritime Research 22(4): 76-83.

· Muhammad N. (2018). Dynamic Responses of Submerged Floating Tunnels with Mooring Cables

under Waves, Earthquakes, and Moving Loads. Ph.D. Thesis, Hanyang University.

· Muhammad N, Ullah Z, Choi DH. (2017). Performance evaluation of submerged floating tunnel

subjected to hydrodynamic and seismic excitations. Applied Sciences 7(11):1122.

· Muhammad N, Ullah Z, Choi DH. (2018). A numerical procedure accounting for fluid drag forces

and cable extensibility for the static response of mooring cables. International Journal of Steel

Structures 18(1): 293-303.

· Muhammad N, Ullah Z, Park MW, Choi DH. (2017). The role of cable stiffness in the dynamic

behaviours of submerged floating tunnel. MATEC Web Conferences. The 6th International

Conference of Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum. 138:1-7.

· Okstad KM, Haukas T, Remseth S, Mathisen KM. (1998). Fluid-structure interaction simulation of

submerged floating tunnels. Computational Mechanics. Barcelona, Spain. Pp. 1-13.

· Remseth S, Leira BJ, Okstad KM, Mathisen KM, Haukas T. (1999). Dynamic response and

fluid/structure interaction of submerged floating tunnels. Computers & Structures 72(4–5): 659-685.

· Veritas DN. (2006). Free spanning pipelines. Recommended practice DNV-RPF105. Pp. 1-46.

· Yiqiang X, Chunfeng C. (2012). Vortex-induced dynamic response analysis for the submerged

floating tunnel system under the effect of currents. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean

Engineering 139(3):183-189.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36785/jaes.82255

Creative Commons License
Journal of Applied and Emerging Sciences by BUITEMS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at www.buitms.edu.pk.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://journal.buitms.edu.pk/j/index.php/bj

Contacts | Feedback
© 2002-2014 BUITEMS